If you go by the rate at which beverages sweetened with sugar, not high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), are being introduced, you might think there are real advantages to switching your purchasing habits.
A recent study at the University of California at Davis, reported in Science Daily, also supports that idea. For 10 weeks, overweight and obese individuals consumed 25% of their calories as either fructose (HFCS)- or glucose (sugar)-sweetened drinks. While both groups gained similar amounts of weight, only those who imbibed the fructose saw an increase in their intra-abdominal fat (the kind that increases risk for health problems). They also became less sensitive to insulin and showed more blood lipid problems but the sugar drinkers didn’t.
Seems like a real shout-out for sugar in our drinks.
Except when you think about it.
Does the Dose Make the Poison?
In this case, even the researchers say dose-response studies are needed to discover the level of fructose associated with the negative changes they saw.
Certainly, consuming one-quarter of our calories in the form of a sweetened drink — regardless of the type of sweetener it contains — exceeds anyone’s idea of healthy eating.
I recognize there may be environmental advantages to switching sweeteners, given the way corn is produced in this country. But I wonder if it makes any difference to our nutritional health what the sweetener is if we’re using it in moderation, that is, minimally.
I also wonder whether folks will think they’re doing something really positive for their health simply by making the switch from HFCS to sugar.
Methinks maybe they’ll think that. But I don’t.
What do you think?